Forgotten Failures & Flops
Presenting, the Suzuki Madura.
http://www.bikez.com/motorcycles/suzuki ... a_1985.php
Any history or problems with this bike? Was it a success or failure? I don't know anything about the bike outside of recalling the name.
_________________
House MD Forum
http://www.bikez.com/motorcycles/suzuki ... a_1985.php
Any history or problems with this bike? Was it a success or failure? I don't know anything about the bike outside of recalling the name.
_________________
House MD Forum
Last edited by moshee on Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- High_Side
- Site Supporter - Platinum
- Posts: 4534
- Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 2:05 pm
- Sex: Male
- Years Riding: 48
- My Motorcycle: Desert-X, CB1100F, CRF300 Rally, Nightha
- Location: Calgary AB, Can
A coworker of mine still has one and it runs well.....still ugly though...moshee wrote:Presenting, the Suzuki Madura.
http://www.bikez.com/motorcycles/suzuki ... a_1985.php
Any history or problems with this bike? Was it a success or failure? I don't know anything about the bike outside of recalling the name.

- TechTMW
- Legendary 2000
- Posts: 2045
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:43 pm
- Sex: Male
- Years Riding: 10
- My Motorcycle: 2005 BMW R1200GS
- Location: Alexandria VA
That's the bike .. http://www.ladj.com/gtsrally/thegts.phpmoshee wrote:Is this the bike?TechBMW wrote: The Yamaha GTS1000 ... Wonderful Idea, crappy execution.
http://www.ozebook.com/yamaha/yam5.htm
What was wrong with it in its execution?
A completely innovative, state of the art machine that should have made it but didn't. Fuel Injection, ABS, a front swingarm and 20-valve head in 1993
The problem is they were selling the bike based on its superior handling - At 560 lbs, this bike was no sportbike - it was a sport tourer.
Let's picture the average sport-tourer - typically buys older technology in a competant frame - They certainly don't go out of their way for new technology, and this proved it. (Actually, the old bmw k1000's sorta proved that)
A sport tourer with an Outrageous price tag, A Chain Drive, and No Luggage option. What was Yamaha Thinking !?!?
If they'd have made the same bike but shortened the wheelbase a bit and made it 50 lbs lighter, I bet they would have sold alot more.
“People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use.”
- Soren Kierkegaard (19th century Danish philosopher)
- Soren Kierkegaard (19th century Danish philosopher)
That GTS 1000 front swingarm suspension is something else. Sorta reminds me of Bimota designs. I agree, its a pity they didn't incorporate the technology on a lighter (sportbike) chassis.
_________________
Zoroastrianism Forum
_________________
Zoroastrianism Forum
Last edited by moshee on Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
We've highlighted less than stellar or successful bikes from most all of the major manufacturers, covering 3 decades of motorcycles. Harley Davidson, Kawasaki, Yamaha, Suzuki, Norton, BSA, and Triumph....... Whoa, what about Honda?
Anyone remember the NR500? The NR500 was not a bike for the masses but was rather, a race bike intended to contest the 500cc GP Championship. It was an utter failure as a race bike and failed to win a single race, even though it was ridden by the likes of Fast Freddie Spencer. While a failure as a race bike, it was a winner in pushing the frontiers of technology.
By the late 1970s, 2-stroke bikes from the other Japanese manufacturers were dominating the race circuits. Soichiro Honda loathed 2-strokes and instead tried to develope a competitive 4-stroke. Presenting the 1979 Honda NR500:
http://www.micapeak.com/DPG/racing/gran ... /nr500.jpg
Here was an audacious short stroke V4 engine with 32 valves (no misprint here, 8 per cylinder), magnesium carbs, 2-plugs/cylinder, and oval pistons (no misprint here either). The engine could rev to 20000 rpm.
While the bike failed to garner a single GP point, the technology eventually showed up in the more successful 80000 dollar 130 hp NR750 endurance racer of the late 80s.
_________________
Taoism Forum
Anyone remember the NR500? The NR500 was not a bike for the masses but was rather, a race bike intended to contest the 500cc GP Championship. It was an utter failure as a race bike and failed to win a single race, even though it was ridden by the likes of Fast Freddie Spencer. While a failure as a race bike, it was a winner in pushing the frontiers of technology.
By the late 1970s, 2-stroke bikes from the other Japanese manufacturers were dominating the race circuits. Soichiro Honda loathed 2-strokes and instead tried to develope a competitive 4-stroke. Presenting the 1979 Honda NR500:
http://www.micapeak.com/DPG/racing/gran ... /nr500.jpg
Here was an audacious short stroke V4 engine with 32 valves (no misprint here, 8 per cylinder), magnesium carbs, 2-plugs/cylinder, and oval pistons (no misprint here either). The engine could rev to 20000 rpm.
While the bike failed to garner a single GP point, the technology eventually showed up in the more successful 80000 dollar 130 hp NR750 endurance racer of the late 80s.
_________________
Taoism Forum
Last edited by moshee on Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Presenting the NR750.LoneWolf wrote:What about the Honda NR750 (I think it was produced in the early 90's)? I read that bike was a loser on the sales floor.
http://www.improvelife.info/v65/special/nr/
Apparently you could recently buy one for 55000-65000 dollars. I read that it sold for 80000 dollars new. For chump change like that, I can understand why it wasn't a big seller. Hell, that would be the price of seconds at OCC, right? If it ain't in the six figured bracket, there must be something wrong with it.
_________________
American Idol Forum
Last edited by moshee on Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.