polarelf2003 wrote:I thought it was funny, too. . . . . except instead of JWF505, shouldnt it be?
010010100101011101000110001101010011000000110101
yes thats what it would be, i halfed that in my last post with JWF111111001, i would have done all of it but didnt want to think about it all that much, just had 505 memorized. Glad people get a kick out of the binary thing, though if i could get a few more comments on the bikes that would be great guys thanks
010010100101011101000110001101010011000000110101