Highway rush hour traffic - Windshield or not?

Message
Author
User avatar
earwig
Site Supporter - Gold
Site Supporter - Gold
Posts: 984
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 2:11 pm
Sex: Male
Location: New Jersey

#11 Unread post by earwig »

Maybe you can get a windshield and only use it for your commute if you are worried. they make ones that pop on and off in 2 seconds now. a short/moderate highway commute is fine without one.
User avatar
Wizzard
Legendary 1000
Legendary 1000
Posts: 1471
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 12:56 am
Sex: Male
Location: Fresno, California

#12 Unread post by Wizzard »

This is solely my opinion , but when I want a windshield I drive the Magic Bus .
I really don't like all that Tuperware............. :laughing:
Regards , Wizzard
"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, throughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming --- ' WOW, WHAT A RIDE!!!! ' " - Author Unknown
User avatar
Loonette
Site Supporter - Platinum
Site Supporter - Platinum
Posts: 2069
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 8:39 am
Real Name: Kristin
Sex: Female
Years Riding: 13
My Motorcycle: 2006/Kawasaki/Mean Streak/best bike ever
Location: Crunchy Granolaville, Ohio, US

#13 Unread post by Loonette »

I use a very low-profile windshield, just to take the edge off. Going 85 MPH, it can be rough to do a proper shoulder check without feeling like my head is going to spin off. My shield is low, with no chrome trim, and I have it angled so that it blends in well with the lines of my bike. To each their own...

Cheers,
Loonette
FIRST RESPONDERS DO IT WITH LIGHTS AND SIRENS!! :smoke:
Find 'em hot, leave 'em wet...

********************
2006 Mean Streak 1600
User avatar
VermilionX
Site Supporter - Platinum
Site Supporter - Platinum
Posts: 5996
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 3:45 pm
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 6
My Motorcycle: '06 Suzuki GSX-R 750
Location: The Valley, SoCal

#14 Unread post by VermilionX »

you could get something like this...

Image

:laughing:

i bet you could block a tornado w/ that.
Bikes Owned:
Gixxer 1000 K6 (stolen)
Gixxer 750 K6

Bikes Wanted:
VMAX
a super kewl cafe racer
User avatar
V4underme
Elite
Elite
Posts: 190
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 12:39 pm
Sex: Male
Location: Stephens City, Virginia

#15 Unread post by V4underme »

Sully... I used a screen when I had the Magna (cruiser). Brand was National Cycle, model was the Deflector screen. Not huge and bulky like a garbage can lid, easy to take on and off, and fully adjustable. I had it tilted way back to keep the wind off my torso. You'll probably want some wind around your helmet in the summer for cooling purposes. Below 65 mph the wind isn't much of a factor, above that it becomes a bigger stress on your body. The screen really does make a big difference at higher speeds, and you can get that deflector screen (or something very similar) off ebay for under $50.
User avatar
old-n-slow
Legendary 300
Legendary 300
Posts: 419
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 3:54 pm
Sex: Male
Location: Victoria BC

#16 Unread post by old-n-slow »

Sevulturus wrote:
I found getting pushed back to the ends of your arms was only an issue on a cruiser. Never had that problem on the 599.
Actually I have a STANDARD and a cruiser. Don't see any appreciable difference regarding wind thrust between the two. In fact the standard is worse then the cruiser because it doesn't have the stepped seat to hold your butt in place therefor I end up hanging on to the bars (without the screen) as though I was going to be blown off. Not my favourite riding option.

What I don't have is a sports bike. I presume that's what you are referring to -- as in (599)?
GarryS ---- "We learn from experience that men never learn anything from experience."
User avatar
jmillheiser
Site Supporter - Platinum
Site Supporter - Platinum
Posts: 2515
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 5:27 pm
Sex: Male
Location: Cheyenne, WY

#17 Unread post by jmillheiser »

Wizz changed his avatar?

now those are some ape hangers
User avatar
Sev
Site Supporter - Gold
Site Supporter - Gold
Posts: 7352
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 7:52 pm
Sex: Male
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta

#18 Unread post by Sev »

old-n-slow wrote:
Sevulturus wrote:
I found getting pushed back to the ends of your arms was only an issue on a cruiser. Never had that problem on the 599.
Actually I have a STANDARD and a cruiser. Don't see any appreciable difference regarding wind thrust between the two. In fact the standard is worse then the cruiser because it doesn't have the stepped seat to hold your butt in place therefor I end up hanging on to the bars (without the screen) as though I was going to be blown off. Not my favourite riding option.

What I don't have is a sports bike. I presume that's what you are referring to -- as in (599)?
i own a standard, it's a 599. It has an upright seating position, pegs right below where I am, a lowered gas tank and a medium/middle center of gravity. It lacks fairings and other accoutrements that would be indicative of a sports bike.

When I rode my cruiser a Suzuki LS650 I found most often that I ended up holding onto the bars to keep me upright rather then being blown over backwards. So a lot of my weight ended up being on my arms, which is very dangerous as it reduces my ability to quickly make directional changes.

When I ride my standard a Honda 599 I find that the slightly forward seating means that I'm leaning into the wind a little, and that means that I'm in a better position to hold myself up against the wind without relying upon the strength of my arms. I actually had nothing to do with the seat for me, because I was just as stable sitting as far forward on the seat as I was with my tailbone against the rise between rider and pillion.
Of course I'm generalizing from a single example here, but everyone does that. At least I do.

[url=http://sirac-sev.blogspot.com/][img]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a227/Sevulturus/sig.jpg[/img][/url]
User avatar
biker_rach
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2006 12:35 pm
Sex: Male
Location: Calgary, Canada

same

#19 Unread post by biker_rach »

I have the same problem, I LOVE the look of a bare cruiser. I have a Shadow ACE and when I bought it it came with saddle bags, back seatrest and windsheild. So lucky for me I never had to decide to buy one :) Anyway, I never took the windsheild off. I drive mostly in rural roads and when I clean that thing... trust me I would not want all those bugs splatted on my helmet and jacket rather than the windsheild. Have also had a few rocks hit it pretty hard that I'm glad didnt hit me. As for the back seatrest I took that off (I spent my share of time on the back with no backrest and found it very comfortable). And the saddlebags... well like I said, I love a bare cruiser, but there isnt one ride I go on to pleasure or to work or anywhere that I dont need a place to put my blasted purse or scarf or extra sweater (canadian here) or shoes for work etc etc etc. I wouldnt be able to survive without those saddlebags :oops:
User avatar
old-n-slow
Legendary 300
Legendary 300
Posts: 419
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 3:54 pm
Sex: Male
Location: Victoria BC

#20 Unread post by old-n-slow »

Stolen from a motorcyle review -- couldn't resist- :? :? :?

But the upright and exposed riding position means high speeds are something you attempt only when your subscription at the gym has expired - half an hour at 80mph into a headwind is worth at least a fortnight's worth of bench presses.

:laughing: :laughing:
GarryS ---- "We learn from experience that men never learn anything from experience."
Post Reply