Time to upgrade. R6 or GSX-R 600?
- kabob983
- Legendary 750
- Posts: 969
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 1:19 am
- Real Name: Chris
- Sex: Male
- Years Riding: 4
- My Motorcycle: imaginary motorcycle...
- Location: Birmingham, AL
Either one is going to go faster than you'll be going on the street, so don't worry about "performance figures" unless you plan on doing track days/racing. I think both bikes look quite sweet. I've always been a fan of the gixxer styling but I really think that Yamaha did a great job this time. As stated the redline is only 15,500 RPM's (not the 17,500 they claimed) which once again probably won't matter as I doubt you'll be hitting that kind of RPM's on the street.
When it comes down to it though I'd probably go with the R6. There's just way too many GSX-R600 using squids around!!
When it comes down to it though I'd probably go with the R6. There's just way too many GSX-R600 using squids around!!
2000 Kawasaki Ninja EX500R (Sold)
2006 Suzuki SV650S (Stolen 4/08, recovered 12/08, sold 3/09)
2004 Suzuki SV650S (Sold)
Being bikeless SUCKS!!!
2006 Suzuki SV650S (Stolen 4/08, recovered 12/08, sold 3/09)
2004 Suzuki SV650S (Sold)
Being bikeless SUCKS!!!
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 8:59 pm
- Sex: Male
- Location: Los Angeles
- Ninja Geoff
- Site Supporter - Gold
- Posts: 2980
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 10:55 pm
- Real Name: Geoff
- Sex: Male
- Years Riding: 7
- My Motorcycle: 2006 Kawasaki Ninja 650R
- Location: Leyden, MA
Yes. So there's nothing de/re-tuned about it. It's a full fledged, twisty carving, power having, fast going bona fide sportbike, just like the others. It just has a slightly better younger brother in the new R6.dtrujillo63 wrote:Another question, so the 2006 R6S is exactly the same as the 2005 R6?
[img]http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/3563/41350009.jpg[/img]
- kabob983
- Legendary 750
- Posts: 969
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 1:19 am
- Real Name: Chris
- Sex: Male
- Years Riding: 4
- My Motorcycle: imaginary motorcycle...
- Location: Birmingham, AL
Wrong. The 2005 R6 had inverted forks, the 2006 R6S does not. That's the only difference though...and the advantage of inverted forks is pretty small.GeoffXR200R wrote:Yes. So there's nothing de/re-tuned about it. It's a full fledged, twisty carving, power having, fast going bona fide sportbike, just like the others. It just has a slightly better younger brother in the new R6.dtrujillo63 wrote:Another question, so the 2006 R6S is exactly the same as the 2005 R6?
2000 Kawasaki Ninja EX500R (Sold)
2006 Suzuki SV650S (Stolen 4/08, recovered 12/08, sold 3/09)
2004 Suzuki SV650S (Sold)
Being bikeless SUCKS!!!
2006 Suzuki SV650S (Stolen 4/08, recovered 12/08, sold 3/09)
2004 Suzuki SV650S (Sold)
Being bikeless SUCKS!!!
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 8:59 pm
- Sex: Male
- Location: Los Angeles
Inverted forks? Is that a good thing or a bad thing?kabob983 wrote:Wrong. The 2005 R6 had inverted forks, the 2006 R6S does not. That's the only difference though...and the advantage of inverted forks is pretty small.GeoffXR200R wrote:Yes. So there's nothing de/re-tuned about it. It's a full fledged, twisty carving, power having, fast going bona fide sportbike, just like the others. It just has a slightly better younger brother in the new R6.dtrujillo63 wrote:Another question, so the 2006 R6S is exactly the same as the 2005 R6?
Thanks,
Denny
- Ninja Geoff
- Site Supporter - Gold
- Posts: 2980
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 10:55 pm
- Real Name: Geoff
- Sex: Male
- Years Riding: 7
- My Motorcycle: 2006 Kawasaki Ninja 650R
- Location: Leyden, MA
My bad. Maybe they did that to make the gap between the two seem that much bigger to get more people to buy the new R6.kabob983 wrote:Wrong. The 2005 R6 had inverted forks, the 2006 R6S does not. That's the only difference though...and the advantage of inverted forks is pretty small.GeoffXR200R wrote:Yes. So there's nothing de/re-tuned about it. It's a full fledged, twisty carving, power having, fast going bona fide sportbike, just like the others. It just has a slightly better younger brother in the new R6.dtrujillo63 wrote:Another question, so the 2006 R6S is exactly the same as the 2005 R6?
[img]http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/3563/41350009.jpg[/img]
- jmillheiser
- Legendary 2500
- Posts: 2515
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 5:27 pm
- Sex: Male
- Location: Cheyenne, WY
- JC Viper
- Legendary 2000
- Posts: 2198
- Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 9:12 pm
- Real Name: JC
- Sex: Male
- Years Riding: 7
- My Motorcycle: 1984 Kawasaki GPz900R
- Location: New York, NY
It "won" the middleweight comparo with them stating best cornering clearance, best brakes, lightweight, "midrange of a twin with zing of a four." Supposedly the perfect balance just a little notchy when shifting.
The Gixxer and CBR both have pretty good feel while the Yamaha and Kaw were near last.
The Gixxer and CBR both have pretty good feel while the Yamaha and Kaw were near last.
One thing you can count on: You push a man too far, and sooner or later he'll start pushing back.


- kabob983
- Legendary 750
- Posts: 969
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 1:19 am
- Real Name: Chris
- Sex: Male
- Years Riding: 4
- My Motorcycle: imaginary motorcycle...
- Location: Birmingham, AL
All personal opinions. A different mag will have the Yamaha winning and the Daytona dead last. Another will have the Suzuki win and the Honda dead last. What they all need to realize is that the Kawasake SHOULD always be dead last!JCViper528 wrote:It "won" the middleweight comparo with them stating best cornering clearance, best brakes, lightweight, "midrange of a twin with zing of a four." Supposedly the perfect balance just a little notchy when shifting.
The Gixxer and CBR both have pretty good feel while the Yamaha and Kaw were near last.

Personally I think the Daytona 675 is just a rediculously sexy bike, it might just get my nod. After that I'd put the Yamaha and then the Suzuki.
But don't buy a bike off of the "performance reviews." Every one is going to have a different winner. Go and sit on each one and see which you feel is most comfortable...
2000 Kawasaki Ninja EX500R (Sold)
2006 Suzuki SV650S (Stolen 4/08, recovered 12/08, sold 3/09)
2004 Suzuki SV650S (Sold)
Being bikeless SUCKS!!!
2006 Suzuki SV650S (Stolen 4/08, recovered 12/08, sold 3/09)
2004 Suzuki SV650S (Sold)
Being bikeless SUCKS!!!
- skinnyjoint
- Elite
- Posts: 216
- Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 9:09 am