Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 6:24 am
Cruiser or sport?ceemes wrote:Okkkay......What is the flying velocity of an unladen swallow?
25 Years. 425 Million Readers. 54 years of Motorcycle Guides ∙ Reviews ∙ The friendliest motorcycle community on the internet!
https://www.totalmotorcycle.com/BBS/
Cruiser or sport?ceemes wrote:Okkkay......What is the flying velocity of an unladen swallow?
Standard........(okay smartarse, answer it nowblair wrote:Cruiser or sport?ceemes wrote:Okkkay......What is the flying velocity of an unladen swallow?
Relative velocity or actual? If relative, to what???ceemes wrote:Standard........(okay smartarse, answer it nowblair wrote:Cruiser or sport?ceemes wrote:Okkkay......What is the flying velocity of an unladen swallow?)
Actual Ground Speed, no tail or headwind, flying against the rotation of earth......now tell me what its NES is boyo.dr_bar wrote:Relative velocity or actual? If relative, to what???ceemes wrote:Standard........(okay smartarse, answer it nowblair wrote:Cruiser or sport?ceemes wrote:Okkkay......What is the flying velocity of an unladen swallow?)
![]()
ceemes wrote:Actual Ground Speed, no tail or headwind, flying against the rotation of earth......now tell me what its NES is boyo.dr_bar wrote:Relative velocity or actual? If relative, to what???ceemes wrote:Standard........(okay smartarse, answer it nowblair wrote:Cruiser or sport?ceemes wrote:Okkkay......What is the flying velocity of an unladen swallow?)
![]()
dr_bar wrote:ceemes wrote:Actual Ground Speed, no tail or headwind, flying against the rotation of earth......now tell me what its NES is boyo.dr_bar wrote:Relative velocity or actual? If relative, to what???ceemes wrote:Standard........(okay smartarse, answer it nowblair wrote:Cruiser or sport?ceemes wrote:Okkkay......What is the flying velocity of an unladen swallow?)
![]()
.........................................................![]()
So, taking the average statistics and plugging them in to the Strouhal equation for cruising flight (fA/U = 7 beats per second * 0.18 meters per beat / 9.5 meters per second) yields a Strouhal number of roughly 0.13:
... indicating a surprisingly efficient flight pattern falling well below the expected range of 0.2–0.4.
Although a definitive answer would of course require further measurements, published species-wide averages of wing length and body mass, initial Strouhal estimates based on those averages and cross-species comparisons, the Lund wind tunnel study of birds flying at a range of speeds, and revised Strouhal numbers based on that study all lead me to estimate that the average cruising airspeed velocity of an unladen European Swallow is roughly 11 meters per second, or 24 miles an hour.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Good lord man WHY........... >.>dr_bar wrote:ceemes wrote:Actual Ground Speed, no tail or headwind, flying against the rotation of earth......now tell me what its NES is boyo.dr_bar wrote:Relative velocity or actual? If relative, to what???ceemes wrote:Standard........(okay smartarse, answer it nowblair wrote:Cruiser or sport?ceemes wrote:Okkkay......What is the flying velocity of an unladen swallow?)
![]()
.........................................................![]()
So, taking the average statistics and plugging them in to the Strouhal equation for cruising flight (fA/U = 7 beats per second * 0.18 meters per beat / 9.5 meters per second) yields a Strouhal number of roughly 0.13:
... indicating a surprisingly efficient flight pattern falling well below the expected range of 0.2–0.4.
Although a definitive answer would of course require further measurements, published species-wide averages of wing length and body mass, initial Strouhal estimates based on those averages and cross-species comparisons, the Lund wind tunnel study of birds flying at a range of speeds, and revised Strouhal numbers based on that study all lead me to estimate that the average cruising airspeed velocity of an unladen European Swallow is roughly 11 meters per second, or 24 miles an hour.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hello? Nobody's ridiculing anyone. Both the OP's and Texfire's questions had been well, truly, and seriously answered.Aamalthea wrote:Good lord man WHY........... >.>
I'd like to know who ridicules someone for asking questions. Seriously. It's called "New Biker's Forum" for a reason.
I don't even have a bike yet and I lurk here asking stuff occasionally :p
Indeed. My answer was carefully interspersed between classic Python. A threadjacking equivalent of saying, "And now for something completely different..."jstark47 wrote:Hello? Nobody's ridiculing anyone. Both the OP's and Texfire's questions had been well, truly, and seriously answered.Aamalthea wrote:Good lord man WHY........... >.>
I'd like to know who ridicules someone for asking questions. Seriously. It's called "New Biker's Forum" for a reason.
I don't even have a bike yet and I lurk here asking stuff occasionally :p
This is satire....... like Monty Python & the Holy Grail, y'know???