Anyways, I went to the dealer two months ago and I was in awe with the 2006 R1. The bike looked a little big but the dealer said, "It will take you a few weeks to get the basic skills down, but after that, you will have a blast on your bike, if you are careful with it, you will do just fine." He was very cajole but I took it because I did not want to upgrade any lower bike because of money constraints.
However, all I used my bike for was to commute and I was never really into the bike until just a few days ago because I rode on and off for the past two months. To really get into my bike, I bought a pair of hiking boots and a leather jacket from goodwill.
But something seems to be wrong, I have been reading through the forums and it seems like even the R6 or GSXR 600 type seems to be a bad beginner bike? There is a post that says no beginner should get a 600 +CC sportbike.
(It also seems to me that some people on this forum flame beginners for not having adequate knowledge on bikes. Don't flame me, I do not know anything about bikes or bike related material..)
I have never crashed but I am beginning to dispise the dealer who sold me this bike. My commutes to and from school can be very difficult sometimes because I cannot shift past second gear because the RPM's are very low and often stalls.. The front wheel is always coming off the ground and the brakes are very harsh on me.
So my question is, does the R1 qualify as a bike that beginners should not get? If so, why did the dealer sell me this bike? I believe there were many of the R6 models that I could have gotten but still, I am becoming very angry because it gets very bad gas mileage and sometimes can be almost dangerously difficult to control. Or are all my bikes like this? If it is, the world of motorcycling seems to be not as it seems.

Thanks, Matt