600+ cruiser vs 600+ sport for first bike

Message
Author
User avatar
waylander
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 2:07 pm
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 3
My Motorcycle: 1983 Honda CB550SC
Location: Edmonton, Alberta

600+ cruiser vs 600+ sport for first bike

#1 Unread post by waylander »

Ok, I have read and understand all of the arguments against buying a 600+ sport bike for my first machine, However, From what I have seen buying a 600+ cruiser seems to be acceptable.

Why?

I assume cruisers, being heavier bikes, don't have the jump that a sport bike has. this along with the fact that cruisers are geared differently would make them a more forgiving bike for the beginner.

Being that I am looking at a cruiser for my first bike this spring (most likely the suzuki m50 (800cc)) I find this whole issue rather confusing.

any clarification would help

tx much
waylander

mgdavis
Legendary 750
Legendary 750
Posts: 763
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 1:17 pm
Sex: Male
Location: Bremerton, Wa

#2 Unread post by mgdavis »

600cc sportbikes are derived from incredibly fast race machines. They put out well over 100hp. They are essentially designed for the race track.

600cc cruisers make half the power of the sportbikes. The handling is far more forgiving. They are designed for entry-level riders.
'07 Suzuki V-Strom DL650
An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man is a subject.
Molon Labe!!!

User avatar
jstark47
Site Supporter - Silver
Site Supporter - Silver
Posts: 3538
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 2:58 pm
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 16
My Motorcycle: '12 Tiger 800, '03 Trophy 1200
Location: Lumberton, NJ

#3 Unread post by jstark47 »

The displacement of any engine only has a very rough relationship to the amount of horsepower and torque it produces. In a very general way, big engines tend to be more powerful than small engines, but there are many other factors besides raw displacement involved.
2003 Triumph Trophy 1200
2009 BMW F650GS (wife's)
2012 Triumph Tiger 800
2018 Yamaha XT250 (wife's)
2013 Kawasaki KLX250S

badinfluence63
Legendary 300
Legendary 300
Posts: 427
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 6:19 pm
Sex: Male
My Motorcycle: '98Ultra w/sc '01 Ultra and 1983FLHS

#4 Unread post by badinfluence63 »

I like and agree what mgdavis said and would like to add that even a 50cc can kill or maime if mishandled or disrespected.

User avatar
shane-o
Legendary 500
Legendary 500
Posts: 741
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 1:30 am
Real Name: Frilly "TuX" Bobkins
Years Riding: 17
My Motorcycle: VTR1000
Location: The bad lands "Melbourne" :)

Re: 600+ cruiser vs 600+ sport for first bike

#5 Unread post by shane-o »

waylander wrote:Ok, I have read and understand all of the arguments against buying a 600+ sport bike for my first machine, However, From what I have seen buying a 600+ cruiser seems to be acceptable.

Why?

I assume cruisers, being heavier bikes, don't have the jump that a sport bike has. this along with the fact that cruisers are geared differently would make them a more forgiving bike for the beginner.

Being that I am looking at a cruiser for my first bike this spring (most likely the suzuki m50 (800cc)) I find this whole issue rather confusing.

any clarification would help

tx much
waylander


Power to weight ratio is why.


something that generates a 100 horse that needs to carry around 600 pounds is not going to be as twitchy as a bike a 100 horse that needs to lug 200 pound around, is why.


Bigger and heavier in bike world does not equate to faster actually in most cases it = slower :)


600rr weighs about 150 kilo and puffs out 130+ horse thats not far from ever kilo having a Hp to match it, thus, very twitchy requireing an assumed level of skill to contain ;) this is like haveing the average car that weighs 1350 kilos with a 1300hp engine then putting it in the hands of a learner then having them drive past your house on the weekends...ah he says :)
[url=http://img21.imageshack.us/my.php?image=ragingtux.jpg][img]http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/6403/ragingtux.th.jpg[/img][/url]

[url=http://imageshack.us][img]http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/7103/thhitlerbx91kg4.gif[/img][/url]
By [url=http://profile.imageshack.us/user/su_tux]su_tux[/url]

User avatar
waylander
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 2:07 pm
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 3
My Motorcycle: 1983 Honda CB550SC
Location: Edmonton, Alberta

#6 Unread post by waylander »

ah indeed. That's just about what I thought, it's just nice to have someone confirm it for me.

Tx all
waylander

User avatar
jonnythan
Legendary 2000
Legendary 2000
Posts: 2470
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 8:08 am
Sex: Male
My Motorcycle: Year/Make/Model

#7 Unread post by jonnythan »

A 600cc inline-four that puts out 110 horsepower is *very very* different from a 650cc V-twin that puts out 45 horsepower.

Also, those 600cc inline-four bikes are race machines that are built with razor-sharp handling and brakes. The 600cc V-twin cruisers are designed to be comfortable, easy to handle, and forgiving. Plus they weigh much more.
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/jonnythan/sets/]Flickr.[/url]

User avatar
Kibagari
Elite
Elite
Posts: 189
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 6:18 pm
Sex: Male
Location: Spencer, MA

#8 Unread post by Kibagari »

Those Inline-Four engines that put out 110 hp, you know where they put those things?

Honda Civics. Now imagine a Honda Civic with a LOT less weight and a LOT more torque. Oh, right, and only on two wheels. THAT is the difference.

A cruiser is geared more towards straight lines and gets its power in a different way than a 600cc sport bike does. A true sport bike is meant for racing (ie twisties).
"Be still when you have nothing to say; when genuine passion moves you, say what you've got to say, and say it hot."
D. H. Lawrence (1885 - 1930)
-------------------------------
1976 Honda CB360T

User avatar
Fast Eddy B
Legendary 500
Legendary 500
Posts: 598
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 6:30 am
Sex: Male
Years Riding: 12
My Motorcycle: 02 Fazer FZS600
Location: Derbyshire, England, UK.

#9 Unread post by Fast Eddy B »

Kibagari wrote:Those Inline-Four engines that put out 110 hp, you know where they put those things?

Honda Civics. Now imagine a Honda Civic with a LOT less weight and a LOT more torque. Oh, right, and only on two wheels. THAT is the difference.

A cruiser is geared more towards straight lines and gets its power in a different way than a 600cc sport bike does. A true sport bike is meant for racing (ie twisties).

A Honda Civic has has a longer stroke engine, and higher displacement. It produces a similar power figure to a 600cc sportbike, but the Civic produces more torque. But I know what you mean.

So, what else is going on?

User avatar
jmillheiser
Legendary 2500
Legendary 2500
Posts: 2515
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 5:27 pm
Sex: Male
Location: Cheyenne, WY

#10 Unread post by jmillheiser »

the main difference between a sportbike and a cruiser is how the engine delivers its power.

the inline 4 that powers pretty much every 600cc sportbike delivers its power at very high rpms and can be difficult to manage for a newer rider, a small mistake in throttle or clutch control can cause bad things to happen.

the v-twin that powers most cruisers delivers is power at lower rpms and in a much smoother and more forgiving manner. This makes the cruiser much easier to manage from a power standpoint (the exception being the huge displacement cruisers at the high end of the segment that have a huge rush of torque right off idle - but these are also not recommend to new riders).

if you want a sportbike as your first bike I would recommend an entry level machine like a ninja 500 or 650 or SV650. the 650 twins that the ninja 650 and SV650 have are much more manageable and forgiving than the 600cc supersports.

Post Reply