Page 1 of 2
Shaft vs chain drive
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 10:06 am
by Balog
Which style is easier to work on for a new rider with limited mechanical experience? What are the pro's and con's of each type?
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 10:53 am
by slimcolo
Shaft, less maint. cleaner but will rob power and very expensive to replace
Chain, more efficent, dirty, requires regular lube and adjustment cheap replacement (compared to shaft) even if replacing sprockets.
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 11:29 am
by mgdavis
The shaft drive is lower maintenance, especially when the weather turns wet.
Most of the bikes you're looking at will come with a chain drive. It's not that big a deal, the chain just needs to be cleaned and lubed periodically.
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 12:34 pm
by jstark47
Modern chains should be lubed regularly but don't need much adjustment. Four bikes in our family, all chain drive, the highest-mileage one (Bonne) has 16K miles, been adjusted once, and just now needs it again. Twice in 16K miles isn't bad.
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 12:34 pm
by HYPERR
Couple of other downsides of shafties....cannot change final gearing & reduced handling performance
Some of the more high tech shafts like the BMW paralever is pretty good. Even if you scrape a peg, it doesn't get too upset. I had a K75 with a conventional shaft and if you scrape something, it turned into a pogo stick.
Modern day o-ring chains are virtually maintenance free. Given a choice, I will take a chain over a shaft everytime.
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 12:58 pm
by flynrider
jstark47 wrote:Modern chains should be lubed regularly but don't need much adjustment. Four bikes in our family, all chain drive, the highest-mileage one (Bonne) has 16K miles, been adjusted once, and just now needs it again. Twice in 16K miles isn't bad.
That's true. The modern O-ring chain is a huge advance over the greasy chains of the old days. The rollers are pre-lubed and sealed.
I use a light silicone lube (no mess) every couple of weeks to keep things moving smoothly. Takes about a minute with the centerstand.
I've also noticed that they don't need much adjustment. On my old bikes with standard chains, it wasn't unusual to adjust the chain every 500 miles or so. On my current bike, I've done two adjustements in the last 19K miles.
Re: Shaft vs chain drive
Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 1:11 pm
by Lion_Lady
Balog wrote:Which style is easier to work on for a new rider with limited mechanical experience? What are the pro's and con's of each type?
You won't find many shaft drives in bikes small/light enough to be suitable for a new rider. . .
P
Re: Shaft vs chain drive
Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 7:07 am
by jstark47
Lion_Lady wrote:Balog wrote:Which style is easier to work on for a new rider with limited mechanical experience? What are the pro's and con's of each type?
You won't find many shaft drives in bikes small/light enough to be suitable for a new rider. . .
Yamaha Virago 535.
Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 10:48 am
by Gunslinger
Another vote for chains. Shafts may require less maintenance but when it does have a problem you're talking $$$. If you can brush your teeth you can keep a chain going for a long time.
Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 1:18 pm
by HYPERR
Gunslinger wrote:Another vote for chains. Shafts may require less maintenance but when it does have a problem you're talking $$$.
Also the condition of the shaft is somewhat of a mystery while the conditon of the chain is out in full view for anyone that cares to see.