Honda DN-01 700 "Sport Cruiser"
Honda DN-01 700 "Sport Cruiser"
Honda DN-01 700 "Sport Cruiser"
Apparaently, this will be put into production.
* Seat Height is 26.7 inches [compare Aero 750 at 25.9]
* Wheelbase is 63.2 inches [compare Aero 750 at 64.8]
* Engine is fuel-injected V-Twin 680cc 65-hp [compare Aero 750 at 45-hp]
* Transmission modes are sport, auto, and semi-auto thumb-shift [ala FJR1300-AE].
* Integrated GPS, built in stereo speakers, and likely ABS/linked braking.
Specs and video of the bike being taken for a run:
http://www.honda.co.jp/motorshow/2005/m ... del/DN-01/
Also see it in the Total Motorcycle Big Book of Concept bikes:
http://www.totalmotorcycle.com/photos/p ... .htm#Honda
as well as an updated on the Honda E4-01 Automatic Super Sports bike as well.
Apparaently, this will be put into production.
* Seat Height is 26.7 inches [compare Aero 750 at 25.9]
* Wheelbase is 63.2 inches [compare Aero 750 at 64.8]
* Engine is fuel-injected V-Twin 680cc 65-hp [compare Aero 750 at 45-hp]
* Transmission modes are sport, auto, and semi-auto thumb-shift [ala FJR1300-AE].
* Integrated GPS, built in stereo speakers, and likely ABS/linked braking.
Specs and video of the bike being taken for a run:
http://www.honda.co.jp/motorshow/2005/m ... del/DN-01/
Also see it in the Total Motorcycle Big Book of Concept bikes:
http://www.totalmotorcycle.com/photos/p ... .htm#Honda
as well as an updated on the Honda E4-01 Automatic Super Sports bike as well.
RE: "Yes, but when?"
The CEO of Honda stated that it would go into production soon and to "Look for it!" I plan on buying this bike and would love if it's available this June but it likely will be a 2007 model which means September at the dealers. At least, that's how I interpret what Honda is saying.
-------------------------
The CEO of Honda stated that it would go into production soon and to "Look for it!" I plan on buying this bike and would love if it's available this June but it likely will be a 2007 model which means September at the dealers. At least, that's how I interpret what Honda is saying.
-------------------------
- jmillheiser
- Legendary 2500
- Posts: 2515
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 5:27 pm
- Sex: Male
- Location: Cheyenne, WY
RE: "it needs to look more like a cruiser"
They are marketing it as a "Sport Cruiser" which I interpret to mean a cross between a sports bike [with the front fairing] and a cruiser. However, it looks like a modern version of a 'cruiser' to me - seat slightly aft of the V-Twin. Perhaps you consider 'cruiser' to mean 'retro-cruiser' like the Harley and Harley-clones.
Those 'retro-cruisers' are pathetic. Someone designed them in 1970 and never changed the design... big stupid round headlight that looks like it came off a 72 Chevy, blinkers-on-a-stick, and stupid gauges that haven't changed in forty years... even too lazy to 'modernize' it with a fuel gauge.
Retro-cruisers are for fat, old, married guys.
They are marketing it as a "Sport Cruiser" which I interpret to mean a cross between a sports bike [with the front fairing] and a cruiser. However, it looks like a modern version of a 'cruiser' to me - seat slightly aft of the V-Twin. Perhaps you consider 'cruiser' to mean 'retro-cruiser' like the Harley and Harley-clones.
Those 'retro-cruisers' are pathetic. Someone designed them in 1970 and never changed the design... big stupid round headlight that looks like it came off a 72 Chevy, blinkers-on-a-stick, and stupid gauges that haven't changed in forty years... even too lazy to 'modernize' it with a fuel gauge.
Retro-cruisers are for fat, old, married guys.
- TechTMW
- Legendary 2000
- Posts: 2045
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:43 pm
- Sex: Male
- Years Riding: 10
- My Motorcycle: 2005 BMW R1200GS
- Location: Alexandria VA
Eaaasy. Some people ride retros because that's what they like. Many of the cruisers on the market have tachs and fuel gauges, etc. Retros also appeal to the "less is more" crowd. Not everyone wants to spend a half hour removing fairings simply to perform basic service on the bike.freebird wrote: Those 'retro-cruisers' are pathetic. Someone designed them in 1970 and never changed the design... big stupid round headlight that looks like it came off a 72 Chevy, blinkers-on-a-stick, and stupid gauges that haven't changed in forty years... even too lazy to 'modernize' it with a fuel gauge.
Retro-cruisers are for fat, old, married guys.
I DO think there are too many clones out there, and even though I don't like this particular 'cruiser' concept I appreciate the forward thinking that went into designing it and all of its features.
And I think JMILLHEISER is right - the power of marketing is phenomenal. This is why people will pay exorbitant prices for a stripped-down styled-in-the-70's (or 50's or whatever) motorcycle. This is also why the massive majority of people think "Harleyesque retro-cruiser" when they hear the word "Cruiser." Calling this concept a cruiser may be technically correct in your eyes, but most people just aren't going to get it.
What should they market it as? Dunno, but it sure as hell looks like a Maxi-scooter crossed with a standard to me. Since it isn't a fully-faired sportbike OR a "retro-cruiser" it's not going ot make any appreciable sales in the US anyway.
Doubt Honda will even introduce it to the US maket because of our preconcieved notions...
“People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use.”
- Soren Kierkegaard (19th century Danish philosopher)
- Soren Kierkegaard (19th century Danish philosopher)
-
- Regular
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 10:49 am
- Sex: Male
- Location: Las Vegas,Nevada,USA
I dunno,if you look around my town,we have a plethora of scooters.Honda wants to market this for the more mature crowd who don,t want the intimidation[fun?] of riding a motorcycle but want to get out on the road.I saw it and and E-04 at tne Long Beach convention very impressive.Alos the more two wheels and less 4 wheels is cool by me.
RJM.