Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought the Busa did 0-60 in about 2 secs, and I thought the ZX14 beat that by a hair or two?jonnythan wrote:Apparently an F1 car can do 0 - 60 in about 2.5 seconds and 0 - 100 in about 3.5 seconds. So the F1 car would be at 100 around the time a literbike hits 60.Sevulturus wrote:It's still pitting a $12000 bike against a $2000000 car. I fail to see what it proves.
In any case, it "proves" that the F1 car has faster acceleration than a motorcycle.
I'm sure I'm not the first person to have wondered which would win a race. It's fun to see someone do.
Just saying, if there's already a stock bike out there that would fare better in this race (busa or ZX-14) than it already invalidates their experiment. As someone already said, its racing a $12k machine verses a million dollar machine.
They made the swingarm longer by a few mm? Try a few feet and see how it fares. Even watching the guy try and keep up in the race as he's pulling a full wheelie. A good driver would have got that front wheel back down so he could use more of his power. You don't see Moto GP guys pulling insane high wheelies for extended periods for that very reason.
Cool to see...up there with the Porche vs jet vs R1 video.
But in the end...they coulda at least used a faster bike for the comparision...preferably a drag specific bike...but I would have even settled for one of the STOCK BIKES that are faster such as a busa or ZX14.
The Car had 900hp and reved upwords of 18,000rpm. With those kinda figures it seems a busa with a turbo or nos would have been a better contender...it would have helped to equal the power/weight distribution between the F1 car and the bike.