Only a small minority of riders on the road today have taken the MSF course. You seem to write them off if they haven't taken your course. I'm talking about things that should apply to everyone who rides regardless of whether they have taken your course.Lion_Lady wrote:Okay. So then, what I'm getting is that you're practicing stuff that you've worked out on your own, with no professional "hands on with feedback" guidance to make sure you're using proper technique.
I've seen motorcycle opinion makers use this argument before. The practical effect is to discourage people from practicing. The underlying logic is that people shouldn't do drills and exercises unless they have "perfect" technique which they can ONLY get from an MSF instructor during a weekend seminar. You could also say it not okay to ride in traffic with less than "perfect" technique but this logic is reserved for PLP.I believe it was Cal Ripken Sr who said, "Practice doesn't make perfect, practice makes permanent. Perfect practice makes perfect."
I provided evidence of my claim that current motorcycle training courses have little effect on crash involvement. The evidence is recent, you have decided it is not sufficient to persuade you. Others may be persuaded.Given that no recognized body has recently completed (or at least published) any study regarding the success rate of motorcycle basic training, I'd say your argument is in the weeds.
The problem is that you can't discuss practice with anyone who has not taken the course you advocate. I don't have that limitation. The "common reference point" is practice itself. If riders aren't practicing they often dispute the necessity of practice instead of discussing it.You said you want to discuss practice. But in order to have a meaningful discussion, we've got to begin from a common reference point. If you haven't taken the BRC, you should consider it anyhow. The techniques taught are still valid and correct, even if the course as a whole lacks sufficient (to your mind) stress on practicing.
People who take the MSF course should be advised about this."Doesn't make a significant difference in safety," okay, so what?
Knowledge is of limited value without motor/balance skills which are only developed with ongoing drills and exercises.Make of what you learn, what you will. No knowledge is worthless and true lifelong learners are always looking for more knowledge.
If you aren't interested in this discussion all you need to do is ignore it.So, you just keep on riding your figure 8s and keep on preaching your doctrine and we'll all just move on.
There are two kinds of "knowledge" in riding. There is the kind your thinking, conscious mind absorbs, that comes from books and lectures and discussions. The other kind is what the human motor/balance system learns and that only comes from direct experience of actually doing something over and over and over.
The courses focus on what the thinking mind can learn because a few days on the range represents very little motor/balance conditioning. To have the best chance of overcoming panic reactions in motorcycle emergencies the motor/balance system needs a phenominal amount of conditioning. Some of that may come, very slowly, on the road, but there will be gaps and inconsistancies. My experience is that the pure motor/balance skills needed for a meaningful safety margin are created perhaps 10 times faster in PLP.