How is he enjoying it? If he put all those 40k on, I can guess the answer to that.BobK wrote:This old Nevada just turned 40,000 km:

Mike
How is he enjoying it? If he put all those 40k on, I can guess the answer to that.BobK wrote:This old Nevada just turned 40,000 km:
Sounds like the Guzzi is a well loved bike then for you both!BobK wrote:I put about 24,000 of those kms on it before he bought it, and he's put the balance on it in the past year. He says he's satisfied with it. His previous bike was a 750 Virago, which he rode across the U.S. but had to leave behind when he came back to Slovenia. Shipping it to Europe was going to cost more than he paid for the bike, so he sold the Yamaha and bought my old Guzzi, and I bought a new Harley.
For anyone who hasn't tried a Moto Guzzi, they are very similar to a Harley. I've test-ridden a Moto Guzzi 1200 Breva and a Griso, and they're very close in sound, feel, and performance to the XR1200. When an old friend of mine from Canada visited us, we rented a Sportster 883 and went riding for a couple of days. Bill, Simon and I all compared the 883, the Nevada, and the XR1200. There's very little difference between an 883 Sportster and a 750 Guzzi. The Sportster weighs slightly more and has slightly more horsepower, so they accelerate about the same, have about the same top speed, and have a similar v-twin vibe.
[/img]
I'm not a big fan of Motorcycle USA reviews myself (I find them light on opinion and biased) but this one they didn't do a bad job with. I'm a little surprised they think they are close though as I definately wouldn't put them in the same field. Both are great bikes in their own right, just too different to compare, like a Honda VTR and a V-Strom 1000. The only think the same is they are a "V-Twin".BobK wrote:They found the XR1200 had more low-end torque while the Griso had more high end horsepower. I didn't ride the two bikes back to back, but that seems right to me. It also describes what we found with the 883 Sportster and the Nevada. The Moto Guzzi engines like to rev more than the Harleys. The Nevada pulls very strongly above 4000 r.p.m.
When I sold the Nevada to Simon I was going to buy a bigger Guzzi, but a friend suggested I try the XR. I'd never thought about a Harley, so was curious to test ride it, and found I liked it. The little Guzzis seem to be made for people with slightly shorter legs than mine, but I found the seating position on the XR was just right for me. I still haven't tried a bike with forward pegs and can't imagine it could be comfortable. Maybe for very tall people.
I do not remember ethanol in the petrol in the UK either, might be just a North American thing (maybe someone here from another country could chime in as well). But it is a big problem here with the tanks and not just on the Harley-Davidsons, but also on the Ducati's and the few years Moto Guzzi made the plastic tanks as well.BobK wrote:I don't think we have ethanol in the gas here. I haven't noticed any swelling of my gas tank in the past year.
My XR1200 will do about 210-220 kilometers (130-135 miles) before the low fuel light comes on, and another 50 before it runs out of gas. It's about the same range as the Nevada. That range is not a problem here, since there are gas stations everywhere. I can see it might cause difficulties out west. That's why they put hard seats on these bikes, so you're not tempted to ride long enough to run out of gas.
Moto Guzzi must have changed ergonomics from the Nevada to the V7. I have a lot more room on the XR than I did on the Nevada.
TMW
Privacy Policy - Forum
Privacy Policy - Terms
and Conditions
Follow us on Facebook - Twitter - YouTube - Pinterest - Instagram - Tumblr - Google+ - Linkedin - StockTwits - News RSS Feed |