
Harley versus Victory
- Ninja Geoff
- Site Supporter - Gold
- Posts: 2980
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 10:55 pm
- Real Name: Geoff
- Sex: Male
- Years Riding: 7
- My Motorcycle: 2006 Kawasaki Ninja 650R
- Location: Leyden, MA
mydlyfkryzis wrote:Why are you comparing a Sportster variant to a touring bike?
The Victory Vision compares to this bike: FLHCTU the Electra Glide Ultra CLassic. I don't like either, but the Vision is a lot sleeker and doesn't look put together from pieces like the Harley.

[img]http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/3563/41350009.jpg[/img]
- storysunfolding
- Moderator
- Posts: 3882
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 10:20 am
- Sex: Male
- Years Riding: 22
- My Motorcycle: Vstrom 650, S1000RR, XS850, ZX6R
- Location: Reston Virginia
Re: Harley versus Victory
Harley does not hold a patent or trademark on the sound produced by their motorcycles.MichaelPadway wrote:. . . the patented sound.

- jonnythan
- Site Supporter - Platinum
- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 8:08 am
- Sex: Male
- My Motorcycle: Year/Make/Model
I saw one in a parking lot a few weeks ago. Took a couple walks around it.storysunfolding wrote:I like that euro harley.
However, you can't call the Vision a failure without seeing it in person or giving it a test ride. It just clicks once you do.
I couldn't believe how much more hideous it is in person. And it's already hideous in pictures.
It's so incredibly ugly I just can't believe anyone would pay so much for it.
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/jonnythan/sets/]Flickr.[/url]
- Scoutmedic
- Site Supporter - Gold
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 9:05 am
- Real Name: Barry
- Sex: Male
- Years Riding: 7
- My Motorcycle: 2003 Honda Gold Wing
- Location: Corry, Pennsylvania
jonnythan wrote:I saw one in a parking lot a few weeks ago. Took a couple walks around it.storysunfolding wrote:I like that euro harley.
However, you can't call the Vision a failure without seeing it in person or giving it a test ride. It just clicks once you do.
I couldn't believe how much more hideous it is in person. And it's already hideous in pictures.
It's so incredibly ugly I just can't believe anyone would pay so much for it.
I'd buy one just to irritate my Harley friends...

- mydlyfkryzis
- Legendary 500
- Posts: 521
- Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 11:21 am
- Sex: Male
- Years Riding: 42
- My Motorcycle: 1976 CB360t, 1991 Honda Nighthawk 750
- Location: Northern NJ
- Ninja Geoff
- Site Supporter - Gold
- Posts: 2980
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 10:55 pm
- Real Name: Geoff
- Sex: Male
- Years Riding: 7
- My Motorcycle: 2006 Kawasaki Ninja 650R
- Location: Leyden, MA
I know, ain't it great?mydlyfkryzis wrote:No Fairing.Ninja Geoff wrote:![]()
No lowers.
No hard luggage.
No 3000000000 amp stereo.
under 5000 lbs.
This isn't even close.
but they hold the patent to the crank shaft used in their bikes, which dictates the firing order which makes the sound they make. So in a round about way...NewGuy wrote:Harley does not hold a patent or trademark on the sound produced by their motorcycles.MichaelPadway wrote:. . . the patented sound.
I'm kinda an anti-harley harley fan. I like sportsters and V-Rods.
[img]http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/3563/41350009.jpg[/img]
First off, I have to say that I'm a big fan of Victory and the Vegas is on my short list for my next bike. The Harley, not so much, except for the Fat Bob, which is also on that short list.
However, I'm not a big fan of the Vision. I believe it's a great bike (don't own one or ever rode one, so I can't give a good consumer report), but the aesthetics are the pits. Having said that, I realize looks are a subjective matter. There are plenty of bikes out there and if you (or I) don't like the Vision, then there's always something else out there.
I agree with Gummiente; both bikes should just not be compared. To each his own.
Note that I did sit on a Vision the other day and found it to be a lot better balanced than it looks. It feels like it is a much lighter bike than it is. I can only imagine how it rides. But, that wide front faring reminds me of a...gasp...car dashboard. Doesn't give me that open, free, feeling of being on a motorcycle.
Still, looks wise, to me, the Vision simply looks like a eurostyle robotic buffalo.
However, I'm not a big fan of the Vision. I believe it's a great bike (don't own one or ever rode one, so I can't give a good consumer report), but the aesthetics are the pits. Having said that, I realize looks are a subjective matter. There are plenty of bikes out there and if you (or I) don't like the Vision, then there's always something else out there.
I agree with Gummiente; both bikes should just not be compared. To each his own.
Note that I did sit on a Vision the other day and found it to be a lot better balanced than it looks. It feels like it is a much lighter bike than it is. I can only imagine how it rides. But, that wide front faring reminds me of a...gasp...car dashboard. Doesn't give me that open, free, feeling of being on a motorcycle.
Still, looks wise, to me, the Vision simply looks like a eurostyle robotic buffalo.
so you're basing your entire review on looks, without ever having even thrown a leg over one?jonnythan wrote:I saw one in a parking lot a few weeks ago. Took a couple walks around it.storysunfolding wrote:I like that euro harley.
However, you can't call the Vision a failure without seeing it in person or giving it a test ride. It just clicks once you do.
I couldn't believe how much more hideous it is in person. And it's already hideous in pictures.
It's so incredibly ugly I just can't believe anyone would pay so much for it.
hey, i agree that it's ugly. (i think only the goldwing is uglier)
BUT
i at least gave it a test ride, and guess what?
it's amazing.
it rides like a dream, doesn't feel heavy in the least bit, and is QUICK.
so if you ever decide to judge a motorcycle by function and performance and not just by how poseriffic it looks, go ahead and throw a leg over.
